To the editor:

I would like to respond to the article by Zac Taylor about hunting wolves in the states surrounding Yellowstone National Park (YNP) by offering the following thoughts – none of which are politically correct:

1.) This obviously biased piece plays the “emotional card” by tugging at people’s heart strings. We should be perfectly clear with the facts – wolves are classified as a game animal with populations subject to control measures via strict hunting/trapping regulations in each of the surrounding states. This situation came about after years of failed litigation, often involving frivolous lawsuits filed to prevent state management. The wolves referenced in the article were legally killed by licensed hunters during a legal hunting season outside the boundaries of YNP.

2.) I seriously doubt that many (if any) of the “wolf advocates” have ever seen a wolf pack pursue an elk herd, isolating a cow or calf and then chasing it down for the “kill.” Some members of the pack run up from behind the targeted animal, biting the rear legs to hamstring it while other members grab the elk’s throat to drag it down for the kill. At that point, regardless of whether the animal is alive or dead, the pack begins feeding on it. That’s the reality of nature, so let’s stop pretending this is a Bambi movie.

I recognize that YNP and the “iconic” animals the tourists come to see include wolves and grizzlies. There is no doubt about the significant economic impact from tourism for all the local economies in the surrounding area. But, there is no mention in the article of the negative impacts caused by either livestock losses or reduced wildlife populations (deer, elk) cause by predation.

If YNP or the wolf advocacy groups feel that strongly about wolves being hunted outside the Park, then I would suggest they pay the costs of fencing the perimeter of the Park to keep them safe. That being said, I’m waiting for the next headline, “Park trout caught by fishermen in WY.”

(s) dave engelhardt


(2) comments

Keith Dahlem

These wolves and bear have devestated the ungulate populations the Moose firs, then the Elk and deerand the Antelope in the Greater Yellowstone Eco System. Nearly no Moose very few Elk limited Deer and close to non-existent Antelope.

Keith Dahlem

Dave good letter, a correction is needed when you refer to wolf advocates, the "kill" is their real rush because they then go and build a bonfire, dance around it in a euphoric state brought on by the ecstatic experience of ecstasy of watching the wolves move in and complete the "Kill".

Dave alludes to the down side of these apex predators the wolf and the grissly bear. The first industry to be devastated has been the Big Game Outfitting Industry closest to the boundary of Yellowstone Park, which has then indirectly affected the lodging establishment who partially depended on those clients staying with them or the outfitting of hunters was historically a part of their operation. Those who have gained have been in Park Concessionaires and their suppliers along with the Montana communities of West Yellowstone, Gardiner, Livingston and Boseman. In Yellowstone the British Columbia Mackensie Valley Grey Wolf the largest of the Wolf Species, the draft horse of wolves way larger than the historical wolf that populated Yellowstone during the first quarter of the 20th Century. It is like comparing the Shiras Moose to the Canadian or the Alaskan


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.