CHEYENNE –  In a message delivered Tuesday to state lawmakers as they convened virtually for the start of this year’s general session, Gov. Mark Gordon promised to continue his defense of Wyoming’s fossil fuel industries while reiterating the state must find a way to stabilize its revenue streams.

The governor typically delivers a State of the State address at the onset of the Legislature’s session, but the message delivered Tuesday was not a State of the State address. This Gordon plans to deliver when the Legislature reconvenes sometime later this spring.

In his message Tuesday, Gordon ran through several topics involving the state’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic since it began last spring. However, of primary concern, as Gordon put it, was the state’s budget, which includes roughly $500 million in proposed cuts to programs and services after long-term declines in the coal industry, coupled with the economic fallout of the pandemic, brought Wyoming’s revenues to abysmally low levels last year.

While he has previously mentioned his potential interest in the repeal of the state’s existing sales tax exemptions, Gordon made no mention Tuesday of any tax proposals, instead emphasizing that any action must be taken “smartly, fairly and decisively.”

“Far more than a simple discussion between cuts or enhancements, Wyoming must look for ways to stabilize the booms and busts that come from a focused revenue source,” Gordon said. “We need to streamline our accounts by having one checking and one savings account to create more transparency during these difficult times.”

Some lawmakers were disappointed in Gordon’s omission of any revenue discussions in his address. In a news conference with reporters Tuesday afternoon, House Minority Leader Cathy Connolly, D-Laramie, said the budget proposal highlights the need for Wyoming to change its tax structure.

“There’s an old saying that says something along the lines of, ‘Don’t tell me about your values or what you care about, show me your budget,’” Connolly said. “This is a budget that we have in front of us that hurts critically needed services for our people in our communities. Health care has been slashed. Substance abuse, mental health services slashed … so we must do better, and we must not accept this budget.”

Other lawmakers noted some newfound reasons for optimism with the state’s budget. The latest projections from the state’s Consensus Revenue Estimating Group, a team of economists and industry experts, were also released Tuesday, showing an increase in the state’s forecasted revenue of roughly $82 million over previous CREG projections, largely due to an uptick in sales and use tax collections.

“I think that (CREG report) provides us in the Legislature a few more options, as we look at the budget that will sit before us very soon,” House Majority Floor Leader Albert Sommers, R-Pinedale, said during the news conference. “I know from my perspective, there’s a handful of programs in the Department of Health, that if the (CREG) report is good enough, then we need to do something.”

Newly elected House Speaker Eric Barlow, R-Gillette, also said he would be open to reexamining some of the proposed cuts.

During his message, Gordon also briefly touched on higher education, arguing Wyoming “must look for ways to better benefit from a more diversified economy, and essential to that is a stronger workforce.”

“Accordingly, I have asked the presidents of our community colleges and our university to come together and develop a proposal for how our institutions of higher education across our state can better coordinate resources to help provide workers the resources they need to live and thrive in an evolving economy,” Gordon said.

However, his lack of comments on revenue options while discussing economic diversification drew further pushback from Connolly.

“What the governor didn’t address well enough is the need for us to not only diversify the economy, but to diversify how we think about revenue streams, as well as our role in the national economy,” Connolly said.

“We could be the center of the nation in terms of doing cutting-edge work when it comes to rural economies, but we also have to think about how we are going to generate revenue for supporting them,” she continued. “And that’s something that the governor, I think, didn’t address well enough while kind of bolstering up on our legacy industries.”

While expressing some concern about the incoming Biden administration’s impacts on Wyoming, Gordon maintained confidence in the state’s key energy industries, stating “we can’t – we won’t – let the misguided actions of special interests and federal agencies rob our future.”

“Let me be clear, our position remains unchanged: We will always defend our state and protect her interests through every legal, political, business and technology option available to us,” Gordon said.

Gordon said he plans to work in tandem with Wyoming’s congressional delegation to promote the state’s mining and extraction industries, as well as the potential for carbon capture technology. He said his team has “good reason to believe we will continue to receive Department of Energy support in the coming years” on the state’s carbon capture endeavors.

(8) comments


Gordon wants a diversified economy, yet continues to invest in dying industries like coal? It's just making it harder for us younger folks to clean up the mess that'll be left behind by all these Trumplicans. I can't wait for the day where we've got real conservative leadership in place. Not the cult that's in office today.

Jim Jones

Investing in dying industries like coal? Kids like you have no idea how the real world works. You need to move to California where there is no coal fired or nuclear electricity. California has rolling blackouts because it can't produce enough electricity with windmills and butterfly farts. California, land of virtue signalling simps, buys coal-fired electricity over the national power grid from Wyoming. But, maybe we can learn from a really progressive country like Norway. Maybe you've heard Norway has the most electric vehicles per capital on the planet. Norway produces all of its electricity from wind and hydro. Norway is the EV capital of the planet because EV owners don't pay VAT (value added tax -20% on the purchase of an EV), they don't pay tolls, registration, parking or ferry charges. How can Norway afford all these giveaways for electric car owners plus super expensive hydro and wind generated electricity? Norway's number one export is oil. Dirty, filthy oil. They sell it to pay for their clean EVs and clean electricity. $57.1 Billion worth last year. You see just like the righteous Democrats in California, Norwegians don't care if they pollute the planet just as long as they don't pollute there own backyards. There are no economically viable substitutes for fossil fuels. There doesn't seem to be a remedy for liberal economic illiteracy, either. Go to a liberal haven like California and you'll pay three times what you pay in Cody for electricity and you'll find yourself without power at least two weeks out of each year. And that's only because California buys dirty, filthy coal-fired electricity from Wyoming. Without it, they'd be in the stone age. Can you let me know what schools are responsible for you gold plated economics education?


Absolutely one hundred percent correct Mr. Jones ! Years ago, I used to pay those exorbitant electric rates. Now, if you want to run your a/c when it's 100* degrees at 9:00 p.m., you'll be awarded with rolling blackouts, and 500-1000, dollar electric bills, just to be able to sleep at night ! It gets 110 -112* in those central valleys. Ha, forget charging your E.V., When they are cutting your power, because of the lack of power ! What gets me, is they have all kinds of wind along the coast of Washington, and Oregon, yet, they want to put their wind turbines in Wyoming.


I specifically call out coal and you start talking about nuclear, wind, oil, and a bunch of other stuff. I'm guessing you weren't the captain of your debate team, old man.

Jim Jones

What part of clean virtue signalling California doesn't have enough electricity even when they buy our dirty coal fired electricity is beyond your comprehension? You want to shut down our coal-fired electricity. Where are we going to buy it and for how much? Please tell me where you went to school. I can't afford to hire any of your fellow alumni.


Please invest all your money in coal and let me know how that works out for you....


I couldn't help but look this up.... FYI, just 3% of California's power comes from coal. 31% currently comes from renewables and that is only going to increase in the future. I'm sure they'll manage just fine without your coal.



CSense - they might just end up fine with renewables. The problem is, so far, they aren't. Outrageous power costs and rolling blackouts are the norm. Wait until everyone has their electric car plugged in... Harvesting Unicorn sparkles and butterfly farts has apparently proven a far more difficult and costly effort than originally planned.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.