Email

An image Dewey Vanderhoff made and handed to Martin Kimmet to give to Vince Vanata.

Two outspoken local residents sparred head-to-head in Park County Circuit Court on Monday over alleged stalking activity.

Park County Republican Party Commiteeman Vince Vanata accused Cody resident Dewey Vanderhoff of stalking, for sending him three emails and one hand-delivered message over the course of four months. The emails contained derogatory language and characterizations of former President Donald Trump.

“The charges Vanata is reflecting back on me – three emails in four months – I get that before noon everyday,” Vanderhoff said. “I get death threats. I’m on the receiving end of so much aspersions based on politics.”

Vanata said the emails impacted his mental health condition and caused significant emotional distress.

“Quite frankly, I am concerned of how far he will go with his course of conduct,” Vanata said in his court filing.

Judge Bruce Waters sided with Vanderhoff in the case and said his actions did constitute an exercise of constitutional liberties.

“They both constitute public figures one way or another,” Waters said. “They’re both calling into radio shows espousing views. One is a delegate. They have opposing views. There’s nothing inappropriate about that. They may not necessarily like each other – but stalking?”

Wyoming law defines stalking as engaging in a course of conduct that includes verbal threats, written threats, lewd or obscene statements or images, vandalism or non-consensual physical contact, directed at a specific person that the defendant knew or should have known would cause emotional distress and fear.

Vanata, who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder after serving in the U.S. Marines, had his service dog with him in court.

When Vanderhof entered the courtroom, he was told by Waters to remove his hat. He responded that he was, “Not real keen on having a dog” in the courtroom either.

Vanderhoff is a self-described journalist, political activist and Republican Party member. He argued that both he and Vanata are public figures and therefore not eligible for a protection order in regards to communication.

“Vanata is elected by the people into his position as precinct committeeman for our area,” Vanderhoff said. “Therefore without a doubt, he has a public persona. I have never engaged in correspondence with Mr. Vanata when he was not a public persona.”

Waters agreed with Vanderhoff that there is a higher standard for harassment and stalking when it comes to public figures, but also recommended Vanderhoff stop sending Vanata messages, as the plaintiff did tell him to stop.

The first email Vanderhoff sent Vanata was in May. He sent another in July, which was identical to the printed out message he gave to Park County Republican Party President Martin Kimmet at the July 3 Freedom Celebration, which Vanderhoff instructed to be given to Vanata.

Kimmet was Vanata’s sole witness on Monday, and attested to the validity of this account.

Vanderhoff delivered this same message to Vanata by email on July 9, at which point Vanata told him to stop sending him emails.

Vanderhoff sent his final email on Aug. 16, criticizing Vanata for his Catholic schooling, and for comments he made on KODI Radio about refusing to wear a face mask and get a COVID-19 vaccination. Vanata denied making both these claims.

Although Vanata said the emails he received were at a private email address, it is an address that’s listed on the Park County Republican Party website. At least one of the emails was sent to multiple other people as well.

“Everything that I sent, the emails and graphic art, I also sent everywhere else, further and yon,” Vanderhoff said. “Mr. Vanata never received any graphically image specially for him. It was all out there, all the time.”

Vanata said he blocked one of Vanderhoff’s email addresses, but Vanderhoff got through to him from another email, one of six he said he actively uses.

On Aug. 18, Vanata submitted his petition for stalking and that same day requested assistance from Crisis Intervention Services, a resource group that ​​helps victims of domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault.

Vanderhoff said he and Vanata have a sordid past dating back to 2011 as the two have clashed repeatedly over political issues. At one point during the hearing Vanderhoff made reference to Vanata and “his tea bag associates” in reference to the Tea Party. Although Vanderhoff quickly retracted this statement, Vanata still took offense to the language.

“I’m taken aback at that derogatory comment,” Vanata said.

Waters said Vanderhoff can still call into KODI Radio to respond directly or indirectly to Vanata on-air.

“You can call in all you want to express views. Just don’t make it personal,” Waters said, to which Vanderhoff responded he never has.

Vanderhoff said he expected the outcome that occurred on Monday and claimed he conferred with Park County Sheriff Scott Steward on Sunday about the charges, who he said also agreed the stalking charge was not applicable.

After the hearing, Vanderhoff personally apologized to Vanata for any harm he may have caused him and said he felt badly for doing so, but also said he would not back down when it comes to political issues. Vanata responded by accusing Vanderhoff of personally seeking him out.

“Just leave me the hell alone,” he told Vanderhoff. “I don’t want anything to do with you.”

(16) comments

Scott Conger

Justin Smith: I remember the days when liberals would say "I hate what you're saying, but will defend your right to say it". How quaint those days were. Now when someone says something you don't like, you "give them no quarter". So, instead of presenting a good argument based on logical fact, what you espouse actually sounds like a physical threat. Not quaint. Not moral. Not enlightened. Not tolerant. Not surprising.

Scott Weber

So you take someone to court because they are harassing you and the judge says to the accused: "You can send all the political emails/vizmos you want to this elected official, but you can't get personal." That sure sounds like a win for Vinnie.

I wish Vinnie had related to Judge Waters that this Rex Dewey turned his back (he was in front of the 200 member audience at

the July 3 "Freedom Celebration" pretending to take photos or whatever...) on Pastor Pat and the featured speaker and spoke constantly during their speech and prayer. I wish THAT was against the law. People who do such disrespectable gestures to our elected officials, reverends, veterans and community contributors should be sentenced to staring at concrete for a few months.

Some learn lessons the easy way. Some learn lessons the hard way....

Viv McCord

It's never a victory to get drug to court for stalking regardless of the outcome, all Dewey is doing is creating a pattern of behavior for the next victim to show in court

Pete Demoney

Weber's comments are classic hypocrisy. He can be rude and disrespectful but demands something different from others.

Justin Smith

How do you support a fowl mouth, uninformed, narcissistic bigot like Trump and expect everyone to shower you with love?

I'm with Dewey.

Viv McCord

So, I'm curious, how much harassment do you deem acceptable for having a different political opinion? Are other things also ok? Such as harassment for a different religious opinion? Please tell me where you draw the line.

Justin Smith

Usually none, unless the person you support says things like "I don't know why we even have courts," or "[Mexicans] are rapists and murderers," or has people at their rallies with nazi and confederate flags; THEN YOU GET NO QUARTER.

Viv McCord

So you are assuming a certain person supports supposed statements by an unnamed 3rd person and then you give no quarter, meaning you feel entitled to harass said person, you are the definition of a delusional stalker. Said person has a right to their beliefs and opinions and free speech just like you, they don't lose their rights because you are triggered

May Morales

“Two People Argue About Politics”

How is this newsworthy?

Dewey Vanderhoff

I agree. It's really not.

Nor is it worthy of expending public resources in the judicial system. A diversion and subversion that should never have come before a judge. In the end perhaps a teachable moment for those contemplating this course of action in the future.

Viv McCord

There might be a teachable moment here for you Dewey. Stop being a political pest, don't follow people through Walmart snapping their pics without their knowledge or permission, then posting them on your facebook with stupid comments trying to shame them into your political views, don't sneak up on women and say comments to them about masks, etc. , Don't BULLY

Joe Whittaker

I bet you $100 that Vanata has called someone "snowflake" in his life. How ironic...

Viv McCord

I find so many people who do not understand what the term " Snowflake" actually means but I can assure you an ex-marine ex-cop is not the definition. Mr. Vanata deserves respect and gratitude for his service to our county and our community. You might ask yourself why Dewey has 6 e-mails.

Joe Whittaker

As someone who served in the US Army & US Air Force, I can assure you there are plenty of snowflakes within the ranks. They usually wash-out and end up working in politics in the civilian sector.

Pete Demoney

I rolled my eyes so hard that I sprained a muscle.

David Stephens

I, as well as many others listen to the KODI morning show and the two mentioned in the article are frequent flyer callers. Kind of surprised that the former cop "tough guy' felt threatened by Dewey. It looks like Judge Waters saw it all for what is was - someone who can dish it out but not take it. CASE DISMISSED!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.