After receiving support in the Senate and multiple committees, a bill that would make significant changes to the preference point system for hunting moose and bighorn sheep died on third reading in the House last month.
Senate File 88 failed on a 22-40 vote Feb. 16. The bill split the vote of Park County’s representatives.
Reps. Sandy Newsome (R-Cody), Rachel Rodriguez-Williams (R-Cody) and David Northrup (R-Powell) voted in favor of the bill, and Reps. John Winter (R-Thermopolis) and Dalton Banks (R-Cowley) voted against it.
SF 88 began life as a recommendation from the Wyoming Wildlife Task Force, a group of 18 individuals convened by Gov. Mark Gordon to study top-priority wildlife policy issues related to the allocation of hunting opportunity and access.
The task force recommended the current preference point system be transformed into a “weighted bonus point system.” The proposed drawing would be completely random, with those who have been in the system the longest entered into the drawing more times. The weighted bonus point system was intended as a way to give sportsmen of all ages their best chance of harvesting the rare animals.
While preference points were originally intended as a way to improve a hunter’s odds of eventually drawing a license in a hard-to-draw hunt area, that’s not often how it works due to the limited number of moose and sheep and an increasing number of interested hunters, task force member Rusty Bell told Park County residents during a public meeting in December.
Newsome spoke in favor of the bill on the House floor, reiterating the task force’s opinion that “the current (preference point) system we have is unsustainable long term.
“This is not perfect in any shape or form, but it does address what is currently a failing system.”
Banks agreed that the current system is broken, but said the proposed bill was akin to “fixing a leaky roof with rotten wood.” He said he was concerned about the impact the bill would have on Wyoming residents who have spent years building up their bonus points in the hope of hunting a moose or sheep.
“It’s a drastic change and a change that’s going to affect a lot of people in the state,” Banks said. “I’ve got a lot of constituents who are sportsmen, guides and outfitters that this will directly affect. This changes the course of what we’ve had for decades … . In essence, we’ve had a contract with those who have put in for these tags for 30 years, and now we’re going to come in and say we’re not going to honor that contract.”
Winter agreed that protecting hunters who have spent years building up preference points should be the Legislature’s top priority.
“There’s too many instances where the bonus point does not work any better than the preference point,” Winter said. “So we just need to figure out some way to take care of these people who have spent all this money and time trying to get a license.”
(2) comments
Sandy Newsome is NOT a hunter and knows NOTHING about hunting or the selection of hunters.... Neither does Northrup for that matter... So OF COURSE it failed... John Winter, however, DOES know plenty about hunting - having been a guide/outfitter his entire life and he of course voted against bonus points vs. our present point system. Our present point system works fine, but you have to have over 20 points to draw a sheep license. Our present point system allows for a person who had put in DECADES of dedicated point earnings to know just about perfectly when they are going to draw (depends on the area). Guides like to know when a hunter is going to draw as well.
As usual, Northrup and Newsome - both liberal "lawmakers" (I use that term loosely as they hardly ever get any bills through) tried to imitate what other states are doing rather than fully investigating how Wyoming is different and that the bonus point system would be better.
But again, you have non-hunters like Newsome and Northrup - likewise not connected in any way to their constituents trying to make law and failing.
In Montana a 12-year old girl got a sheep tag. Here in Wyoming it will take you 20+ years or $300,000 to do so immediately! Hmmm...
Talk about disconnection of lawmakers with their state...
We all really value your contribution to this. Seems like you shared your hunting wisdom with Nina Webber right before she went hunting in a field next to a post office, a highway and several homes, and we will keep that in mind any time you share your views on the best way for people to think about how the state regulates hunting. Keep up the good work!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.