Wyoming Game and Fish meet and greet

Large carnivore conflict coordinator Brian DeBolt (right) explains the difference between a black and a grizzly bear to Kobee Miller, 8, during the Wyoming Game and Fish meet and greet Wednesday at the Holiday Inn.

While Wyoming is proceeding with plans for a grizzly bear hunt beginning Sept. 1, a federal judge in Missoula, Mont., announced last week he plans to conduct an August hearing on whether or not the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service appropriately delisted the animal from Endangered Species Act protection.

“I shouldn’t say I’m surprised,” said Brian Nesvik, the state’s chief game warden who has spent years studying grizzly issues and now is helping shepherd rules and regulations for a hunt through Game and Fish protocols.

“We’re not changing anything,” Nesvik said of moving ahead with statewide hearings and rules regulating a hunting season while the court case percolates.

Of the timing of the August hearing seeming as if it is aimed at Wyoming, he said, “It certainly appears that way.”

U.S. District Judge Dana Christensen denied the federal government’s request to delay handling of six lawsuits and turned down three other motions to decide the case on technicalities.

Wanting immediate action, Katherine O’Brien, an attorney for Earth Justice, said, “Meanwhile, Wyoming will be turning 24 bears into rugs and wall hangings.”

Game and Fish director Scott Talbott emphasized during a visit to Cody last week the species is recovered and the state’s pending rules are part of “extremely conservative management.”

Wyoming has proposed a maximum of 24 bears hunted between Sept. 1 and Nov. 15, although with built-in limits for females taken that could shut the season down quickly if two are killed.

Idaho has planned a hunt to harvest a single bear. Montana has decided not to conduct a hunt in 2018.

Fish and Wildlife returned management of the Yellowstone grizzly to the states of Wyoming, Montana and Idaho effective last July 31 after more than 40 years of protection and after declaring it was a recovered species.

The delisting action also followed years of cooperative study between federal, state and other agencies studying the bears’ progress.

The expansion of the population from a low of 136 in the 1970s to an estimated 700 now prompted the action.

Hunting was an option included in a master management plan for the states for population control.

Irate nongovernmental organizations such as the Sierra Club and Earth Justice protested the delisting, saying it was premature. The groups joined forces with Native American tribes in filing lawsuits. Tribes call bears sacred animals and integral to their religion.

Bonnie Rice of the Sierra Club applauded the court announcement last Friday.

“We welcome the court’s decision this week denying the federal government’s motion to stay litigation challenging the Yellowstone grizzly delisting rule,” Rice said. “The delisting rule should be withdrawn until the Service can get it right and make a determination that passes legal and scientific muster.”

The courtroom was crowded with lawyers representing Fish and Wildlife, the Northern Cheyenne, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, the National Parks Conservation Association, the Humane Society of the United States, Wild Earth Guardians, Safari Club International, the National Rifle Association and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

The Yellowstone grizzly is the only group of animals to be delisted, while protections remain in place for five other grizzly areas.

A few months ago a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. overturned delisting of grey wolves in the Western Great Lakes on the grounds it must be demonstrated how delisting one group would affect the other.

Opponents of delisting believe the same standard should be applied to grizzlies, while proponents say the fact grizzlies have recovered in the Yellowstone area has nothing to do with how they are faring elsewhere.

“They don’t have anything to do with it,” said Park County Commissioner Loren Grosskopf, who has been an active member of committees studying grizzly recovery and in drafting suggestions for the final Fish and Wildlife plan. “They are separate issues.”

Opponents of delisting, Grosskopf said, are engaged in a last-ditch effort to block the plan and prevent Wyoming management.

“They’re just throwing things at the wall,” Grosskopf said of the reasoning behind the lawsuits. “The anti-hunters, this is their last gasp. They desperately need a win. They’ll turn over every rock.”

Confident it is doing the right thing and empowered by the Fish and Wildlife ruling, Game and Fish has floated a draft of its hunting plan. Two-thirds of the tags for a bear hunt would go to Wyoming residents and six of the 24 to nonresidents.

Twelve tags would be for the Yellowstone grizzly area outside of Yellowstone National Park and Teton National Park. The other 12 would be for areas with less optimum habitat.

A public comment period is open and a series of hearings, including one April 10 in Cody, are scheduled.

Under the agency timetable, a recommended rule would be presented to the policy-making Game and Fish Commission at its May 23 meeting.

“Is there any reason to slow down or stop?” Grosskopf said. “No.”

May commission action would give the department enough time to finalize preparation for a fall hunt.

All of that work will move forward, Nesvik said.

However, if the court rules in August the delisting itself was illegal, a hunt would be shelved.

“It changes everything,” Nesvik said.

(5) comments

Publius

Go for it, there are plenty of them. The old ones are pushing the young ones out of the mountains. Tracks were found last fall east of Cody, certified as grizzly tracks by WY G&F.

slickrockhounds

Blocking Hunting as a management tool will only result in those of us who live with bears daily to begin shooting the problem bears.
Right now we are shooting them with pepper spray, rubber bullets and noise makers , in the expectation that many of these bears will be culled during hunting season this fall.
Blocking our hunting season will not save any bears. You would know that if you lived here.

Justine

Your 'problem bears' are 'problems' only because people do not protect their garbage, feed, or livestock. We are living in their habitat and so should do what we can to keep them wild. I've lived with grizzlies for over fifteen years in my valley without any problems, even though the G&F drop off the "problem bears" here. Grizzlies are minders of their own business as long as people give them the room. P.S. Bear spray works great!

Justine

Last year around 50 grizzlies were killed, most by humans. If we assume around the same number this year, and add those 25 extra bears to the mix that G&F wants to give licenses for, Wyoming will be very fast approaching re-listing numbers. G&F has an elaborate "plan" for keeping dead hunted bears out of the public's eye. Why is that? It's because tourists, who fuel our economy here, want to see live grizzlies, not a headless skinned carcass. G&F's "plan" will not solve conflict bears. They will only kill random bears, as well as females. And please remember that it takes 10 years for a female to duplicate herself. Let that sink...10 years!

We are and can continue living and co-existing with this iconic intelligent animal. Taking a vacation to New Mexico, I am in country where grizzlies used to be just 100 years ago. Shot one by one to extinction for sport and cattlemen complaints. We can do much better and allow our grizzlies to connect through corridors up into Montana. Grizzlies have lost almost all their habitat they formally occupied in the U.S.--living in just 1% of their former range. Let's give them a chance. Where grizzlies are no more, real wilderness has disappeared forever.

DeweyV

The ONLY reason to codify the trophy hunting of Yellowstone Grizzly Bears is to satiate the egos of the shooters, who just want to kill something bigger and meaner than them using their projectile weaponry. That's it. Shooting a grizzly bear in Wyoming as delineated here is not exactly hunting, it's just extripation; killing. What it is not is genuine wildlife conservation or adaptive management. Delisting the bear from the Endangered Species protections was done using political science, not biological science, and it wasn't even the "best available" politicals cience. The bear management plans are people plans, not crafted with the bear's interests at the fore. A real bear management stratgy would look 150 years into both the past and future, and across several states including but not limited to Wyoming, Montana and Idaho at landscape scale. It would be driven by ecology, not economics. It would ignore man-drawn map lines and political subdivision boundaries. (Bears already pretty much do that) The biggest failure of US Fish and Wildlife and the State big game managers comes in not creating a physical mechanism for relocating those "surplus" bears to the good bear habitat zones that can be found from the San Juan Mountains of SW Colorado all the way to the Canadian border (or beyond) on either side of the Continental divide out to the low country. We have failed the Great Bear. The bureaucracies trumped the biologics; the special interest groups and narrowminded stakeholders have superseded the scientists and genuine wildlife conservationists from the local Courthouse, the statehouse, all the way to Denver and Washington D.C. at every stage. It's ridiculous to think for one moment that using only rifles to mortally control bears to keep a minimum of 500 bears and a maximum of 700 bears inside an artifical Zoo Zone drawn around Yellowstone Park is "success" after 40 years of recovery and $40 million invested. It is instead an indictment of human hubris and self-interest. At the end of the day, all you want to do is kill bears. That's not success. It's not hunting. It's not conservation. It's just hubris. Nothing to be proud of...

(Edited by staff.)

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.